-
Julian Sanchez detects the philosophy of Ayn Rand in
Ratatouille. Is Brad Bird a crypto-Objectivist? Cool!
(Arguable spoilers at the link, which means you
should just go see the movie, for goodness' sake.) But that's not all
…
-
Peter
Suderman says:
I have a lot to say about Ratatouille, even beyond that
it's the finest movie about a French rat chef ever made (which it
is), and that, so far as I can tell, it's the best movie of the
summer, and currently vying with Fincher's Zodiac for the
best movie of the year.
But he doesn't have time to say much beyond that, so he links to
…
-
Ted
Pigeon, who states:
Make no mistake, though; this is a brilliant movie. Not a brilliant
Pixar movie. Not a brilliant animated movie. A brilliant movie. So
brilliant, I contend, that I would proclaim Brad Bird as one of the
really unique voices in American cinema.
Ha! I knew it! Ted's got a lot backing up this
soon-to-be-conventional wisdom. But he also links to …
-
Brendan
Bouzard, who (among other things) claims:
Ratatouille's greatest
formal innovation might be the incredible way it articulates focus as a
storytelling element into popular computer animation. Its execution here
is flawless, perfectly mimicking the depths-of-focus one might expect
from various lensings used in the film, and adding yet another layer of
stunning false indexicality to draw a viewer into the narrative.
Gosh, that almost makes me want to find out what the Sam Hill
"false indexicality" might be. If you haven't seen it yet, though,
pay some attention to the focus.
It's nice to see one's plebeian movie instincts supported by Totally Serious
film reviewers. ("See, smart people liked it too!")
Posted
2007-07-08 9:47 PM EDT
Last Modified
2012-10-19 6:09 AM EDT